Technology is all around us.
As my family will attest, I am not a huge fan of digital technology. Yes, I have adopted or adapted to some forms of technology.
I have a smartphone, although I think I use a quarter of its capabilities. I have an tablet, which is old, so probably outdated. I have my trusty laptop, which of course I use to write, email and search. I am on Facebook, as I felt to be in the marketplace I needed to be there. I rarely touch twitter but it’s there, I have even adopted tap and go payments on my card – not my phone!
So is technology actually doing us good?
I sometimes succumb and use the self-serve checkout, which means I forego the human contact. For me that’s not going to have too big of an impact because I meet and speak with people every day as part of my job and my social life. If however I was living alone, with very few social contacts, the person at the supermarket checkout, just might be that one person I connect with today.
So is technology a one-way train that we are all on? Or, do we have the choice to decide what parts of technology are good for us and what parts are not?
Richard Watson, author of “Digital vs Human” in a recent interview with Radio National, suggests that the minds that create these technologies are largely on the Asperger’s/Autistic Spectrum, and so these developments actually suit them, and in the constant use of these technologies, we are all becoming slightly more autistic.
In his interview, Watson speaks about the way we are communicating is changing along with what we are communicating.
The growth in narcissism as well as hate can be directly related to the growth in our type of communications, being less accountable face-to-face and being more removed.
We are developing much more fragile identities, with less resilience.
We are dependent on how many ‘friends’ we have, even though we may never have met these people or had a conversation with them about what is important to them or to us, which is usually what gels friendships together.
We are dependent on the number of ‘likes’ we get when we ‘post’ something, rather than having a conversation/discussion/even an argument about liking or not liking something.
Just because a handful of people (often men in California with limited social skills if we are to believe biographies, biopics and Richard Watson) develop technology that suits them, doesn’t necessarily mean it will suit the rest of us, and actually it doesn’t.
Sadly, Watson’s book also refers to a Korean couple who let their own baby die of starvation, because they were too busy looking after their avatar baby online!
A more recent and topical example of technology changing the way we behave and how individually focused we can become, is that of the Pokemon Go craze. Our local highway signs now flash “Don’t Pokemon and Drive” – really????
As human beings we are social creatures. We need to connect on so many levels – physically, emotionally, psychologically, and socially. Connecting online does not, and cannot meet all those needs.
I like to think that we can adapt and adopt, so long as we keep reminding ourselves we do have a choice.

Listening to Danny Frawley’s interview on Triple M, without specifying it, Danny was talking about the 5 Ways to Wellbeing. While Danny doesn’t use this language, unknowingly (most likely) he has discovered the 5 Ways – to be present, be active, connect, give and learn.
As I wait for someone in a park in my beautiful city, I decide, as I often do in situations like this, to take the opportunity and sit in a soundscape meditation.







.jpg)


